Advancing Sustainable Agricultural and Bioscience Research in a Changing World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66348/abr.26.a64Keywords:
Sustainable agriculture; Biosciences; Food security; Climate-resilient agriculture; Agroecology; Bi-otechnology; Soil health; Precision agriculture; Circular bioeconomyAbstract
The growing complexity of global issues concerning food security, environmental sustainability and biological innovation demands the transformational and interdisciplinary research agenda in agricultural and biosciences. This editorial proposes the new Agricultural and Bioscience Review (ABR) as an academic journal that focuses on promoting high quality, peer-reviewed research that combines agricultural systems, biological sciences, and sustainable biosystems. The article underscores the importance of interdisciplinary strategies to tackle climate change, degradation of resources, and increasing agri-food system demands of resilience and efficiency. It underlines the significance of methodological rigour, technological innovation, and translational relevance to produce actionable knowledge both to the academic and policy communities. Themes addressed are agro-resilient to climatic change, precision and digital agriculture, soil and ecosystem health, biotechnology, circular bioeconomy, and food systems sustainability. The editorial also highlights the necessity of inclusive and globally representative research that is reflective of various agro-ecological and socio-economic contexts. ABR hopes to play a role in ensuring sustainable agricultural practices, resilient ecosystems, and effective policy frameworks by promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration and evidence-based solutions. The focus on scientific excellence and global inclusivity makes the journal an important channel through which knowledge can be advanced and sustainable development fostered in the area of agriculture and biosciences.
Received: 2026-05-04 | Revised: 2026-08-21 | Accepted: 2026-08-21 | Published: 2026-08-30
Funding: N/A.
Data Availability Statement: N/A.
Acknowledgments: N/A.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Downloads
References
Burghof, H.-P. & Prothmann, F. (2011). The 52-week high strategy and information uncertainty. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 25(4), 345-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-011-0161-2
Cheema, M.A., Nartea, G.V., & Man, Y. (2017). Cross-sectional and time-series momentum returns and market states. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2931620.
De Moor, L., & Sercu, P. (2015). The smallest stocks are not just smaller: Global evidence. European Journal of Finance, 21(1), 51-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2013.769889
Derigs, U., & Marzban, S. (2008). Review and analysis of current Shariah-compliant equity screening practices. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(4), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538390810919600
Dimson, E., & Marsh, P. (1991). Murphy’s law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 25(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1999.319734
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
N/A
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mesut Doğan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.