Impact of Regulatory Impact Assessment on Policy Effectiveness in India: Evidence from ARDL Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66348/jpa.26.v1.n1.a27Keywords:
Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA); Policy Effectiveness; Governance Quality; ARDL Model; Institutional Economics; India; Time-Series Analysis; Evidence-Based Policymaking; State Capacity; Regulatory GovernanceAbstract
This study investigates the impact of Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) on policy effectiveness in India by employing a time-series econometric framework. Drawing on annual data for India and incorporating key governance indicators and macroeconomic controls, the study applies the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach to examine both long-run and short-run relationships. The empirical results confirm the existence of a stable long-run equilibrium among RIA, governance quality, macroeconomic variables, and policy effectiveness. The findings reveal that RIA has a statistically significant and positive effect on policy effectiveness, indicating that systematic regulatory evaluation enhances the quality, coherence, and implementation of public policies. Governance indicators such as regulatory quality, government effectiveness, rule of law, and control of corruption also significantly contribute to improved policy outcomes. Additionally, GDP per capita and trade openness are found to strengthen policy effectiveness, highlighting the role of macroeconomic conditions in institutional performance. The Error Correction Model further confirms rapid adjustment toward long-run equilibrium, reinforcing the dynamic stability of the system. Overall, the study underscores the importance of integrating regulatory evaluation mechanisms with strong institutional frameworks to improve governance outcomes in India. The findings provide important implications for policymakers seeking to strengthen evidence-based policymaking and enhance regulatory efficiency.
Received: 2026-04-10 | Revised: 2026-06-02 | Accepted: 2026-06-23 | Published: 2026-06-30
Declarations
Ethics and Guidelines: Not Applicable.
Consent to participate: Not Applicable.
Consent to publish: The authors have provided consent to publish.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability statement: Data will be made available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Clinical Trial Number: Not Applicable.
Declaration of using generative AI: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used ChatGPT in order to correct the grammatical errors. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.K.S.; methodology, S.K.S.; formal analysis, S.K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.S.; writing—review and editing, S.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Downloads
References
Awewomom, J., Dzeble, F., Takyi, Y. D., Ashie, W. B., Ettey, E. N. Y. O., Afua, P. E., Sackey, L. N. A., Opoku, F., & Akoto, O. (2024). Addressing global environmental pollution using environmental control techniques: A focus on environmental policy and preventive environmental management. Discover Environment, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00033-5
Biermann, F., Hickmann, T., Sénit, C.-A., Beisheim, M., Bernstein, S., Chasek, P., Grob, L., Kim, R. E., Kotzé, L. J., Nilsson, M., Ordóñez Llanos, A., Okereke, C., Pradhan, P., Raven, R., Sun, Y., Vijge, M. J., Van Vuuren, D., & Wicke, B. (2022). Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 5(9), 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5
Carroll, P. (2010). Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy? Policy and Society, 29(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.009
Fan, F., Lian, H., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2021). Can environmental regulation promote urban green innovation Efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125060
Fu, L., Sun, Z., Zha, L., Liu, F., He, L., Sun, X., & Jing, X. (2020). Environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavior within China’s road freight transportation industry: Moderating role of perceived policy effectiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119796
Hertin, J., Jacob, K., Pesch, U., & Pacchi, C. (2009). The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment – An empirical analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.004
Kirkpatrick, C., & Parker, D. (2004). Regulatory impact assessment and regulatory governance in developing countries. Public Administration and Development, 24(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.310
Liu, G., Yang, Z., Zhang, F., & Zhang, N. (2022). Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s Environmental Protection Tax Law. Energy Economics, 109, 106000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106000
Liu, M., Tan, R., & Zhang, B. (2021). The costs of “blue sky”: Environmental regulation, technology upgrading, and labor demand in China. Journal of Development Economics, 150, 102610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102610
Neves, S. A., Marques, A. C., & Patrício, M. (2020). Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.005
Shuai, S., & Fan, Z. (2020). Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China: Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model. Journal of Environmental Management, 261, 110227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110227
Song, M., Peng, L., Shang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2022). Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121276
Song, M., Xie, Q., & Shen, Z. (2021). Impact of green credit on high-efficiency utilization of energy in China considering environmental constraints. Energy Policy, 153, 112267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112267
Song, M., Zhao, X., & Shang, Y. (2020). The impact of low-carbon city construction on ecological efficiency: Empirical evidence from quasi-natural experiments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157, 104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104777
Xu, X., & Li, J. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574
Zhang, G., Jia, Y., Su, B., & Xiu, J. (2021). Environmental regulation, economic development and air pollution in the cities of China: Spatial econometric analysis based on policy scoring and satellite data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129496
Zhang, J., Kang, L., Li, H., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Skitmore, M., & Zuo, J. (2020). The impact of environmental regulations on urban Green innovation efficiency: The case of Xi’an. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102123
Zhang, Y., Li, S., Luo, T., & Gao, J. (2020). The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121843
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sunil Kumar Saha (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.