Uncovering Global Emission Regimes Using Unsupervised Learning: A Structural and Dynamic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66348/srr.26.a75Keywords:
Greenhouse gas emissions, PCA, Markov transitionsAbstract
Understanding the structural composition of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is critical for effective climate mitigation, yet existing research largely focuses on aggregate levels rather than the multivariate structure of sectoral emissions. This study develops a data-driven framework to identify emission regimes using a global panel dataset for 172 countries over 1990–2023. Sectoral emissions are transformed into compositional vectors to capture relative contributions, followed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and K-means clustering to uncover latent structural regimes. The first two principal components explain 37.9% of total variance and reveal clear gradients distinguishing agriculture-dominated versus industrial-energy systems and fossil extraction versus urban-consumption emissions. Five distinct regimes are identified based on silhouette optimization (s̄ = 0.38). A first-order Markov transition analysis shows strong persistence, with diagonal probabilities ranging from 0.876 to 0.973, indicating high path dependence and limited short-term mobility across regimes. However, gradual transitions toward mixed emission systems suggest slow structural diversification. Robustness checks confirm stability, with between-cluster variance explaining 68.5% of total variation. Overall, the findings show that global emission systems are not homogeneous; rather, they exhibit distinct structural patterns across regions, strong persistence over time, and only gradual transitions between regimes. These findings highlight the importance of moving beyond aggregate emission trends and focusing on structural emission regimes to better understand the long-run evolution of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Declarations
Consent to publish: The authors have provided consent to publish.
Competing interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Data availability statement: The data used in this study are available from publicly accessible sources.
Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Clinical Trial Number: Not Applicable.
Declaration of using generative AI: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used ChatGPT in order to correct the grammatical errors. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.
Author Contributions: R.E.A.R.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Downloads
References
Afuye, G. A., & Tolios, G. (2026). Quantitative impacts and patterns of greenhouse gas emission trends: Implications for global change and policy. Carbon Management, 17(1), Article 2622340. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2026.2622340
Aitchison, J. (1982). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 44(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01195.x
Anderson, T. W., & Goodman, L. A. (1957). Statistical inference about Markov chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177707039
Blok, K., Afanador, A., Van Der Hoorn, I., Berg, T., Edelenbosch, O. Y., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (2020). Assessment of sectoral greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials for 2030. Energies, 13(4), Article 943. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040943
Chen, S., Kang, X., & Park, S. Y. (2025). Transitions of carbon dioxide emissions in China: K-means clustering and discrete endog-enous Markov chain approach. Climate, 13(8), Article 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13080165
du Can, S. d. I. R., & Price, L. (2008). Sectoral trends in global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1386–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.017
Ganzenmüller, R., Pradhan, P., & Kropp, J. P. (2019). Sectoral performance analysis of national greenhouse gas emission inventories by means of neural networks. Science of the Total Environment, 656, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.311
Haberl, H., Löw, M., Perez-Laborda, A., Matej, S., Plank, B., Wiedenhofer, D., Creutzig, F., Erb, K.-H., & Duro, J. A. (2023). Built structures influence patterns of energy demand and CO₂ emissions across countries. Nature Communications, 14(1), Article 3898. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39728-3
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A K-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830
Hastuti, S. H., Hartono, D., Putranti, T. M., & Imansyah, M. H. (2021). The drivers of energy-related CO₂ emission changes in In-donesia: Structural decomposition analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9965–9978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11414-7
Jiménez-Preciado, A. L., Cruz-Aké, S., & Venegas-Martínez, F. (2024). Identification of patterns in CO₂ emissions among 208 countries: K-means clustering combined with PCA and non-linear t-SNE visualization. Mathematics, 12(16), Article 2591. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162591
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Graphical representation of data using principal components. In Principal component analysis (2nd ed., pp. 64–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835
Lamb, W. F., Wiedmann, T., Pongratz, J., Andrew, R., Crippa, M., Olivier, J. G., Wiedenhofer, D., Mattioli, G., Khourdajie, A. A., House, J., et al. (2021). A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental Research Letters, 16(7), Article 073005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e
Martín-Ortega, J. L., & González-Sánchez, M. (2025). Sectoral composition of GDP and greenhouse gas emissions: An empirical analysis in EU27. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(2), 3899–3926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04048-5
Mercure, J.-F., Pollitt, H., Bassi, A. M., Viñuales, J. E., & Edwards, N. R. (2016). Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy. Global Environmental Change, 37, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.003
Moghtader, B., Ulengin, F., Yıldız, E. H., Aktas, E., & Topcu, Y. I. (2026). Trade flows and carbon emissions: How far are we from the climate targets? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2026.2649318
Paramarta, V., Rahman, A., Priska, L., Roken Gurning, R., & Ayu Purwati, W. (2025). Comparative Analysis of K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Model in Clustering Global CO2 Emissions. Bit-Tech, 8(1), 998–1008. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v8i1.2805
Qu, S. (2020). The decomposition analysis of carbon emissions: Theoretical basis, methods and their evaluations. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 8(4), Article 2050020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748120500207
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Salat, S. (2009). Energy loads, CO₂ emissions and building stocks: Morphologies, typologies, energy systems and behaviour. Building Research & Information, 37(5–6), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210903162126
Su, B., & Ang, B. W. (2012). Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Aggregation issues. Economic Systems Research, 24(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.677997
Wen, L., & Hao, Y. (2024). Factor decomposition and clustering analysis of CO₂ emissions from China's power industry based on Shapley value. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 46(1), 9362–9378. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1776795
Yu, S., Wei, Y.-M., Fan, J., Zhang, X., & Wang, K. (2012). Exploring the regional characteristics of inter-provincial CO₂ emissions in China: An improved fuzzy clustering analysis based on particle swarm optimization. Applied Energy, 92, 552–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.068
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data will be available on request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rabiah Eladwiah Abdul Rahim (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.